Develop and Incorporate a Formalized Faculty Evaluation Process into your Training Program

Course Overview

Per the ACGME Common Program Requirements (CPR), programs must have a process to annually evaluate each teaching faculty. Training programs can be overwhelmed by how to structure such a review and organize the data to be meaningful. Our program developed a process to conduct this formalized annual review. While initially designed as a way to be compliant with the CPR, additional positive outcomes have been realized. In this interactive session, we will review 5 years of data demonstrating how our evaluation process has expanded as a tool to thank faculty, acknowledge effort to Chair and Division Directors, reinforce and sustain involvement in our program, identify faculty in need of mentorship, assist in academic promotion, increase evaluation completion rate, and improve our teaching faculty. Attendees will work to develop relevant faculty evaluation metrics and identify obstacles to successful intervention in their own program. Sample documents used in our process will be provided.

Learning Objectives

Assess whether your program's current process of evaluating teaching faculty annually meets the standards of the ACGME Common Program Requirements
Identify relevant program metrics used to evaluate teaching faculty
Learn of the additional departmental and institutional benefits of a holistic programmatic Annual Faculty Review

Speakers

Laura Ozark MD, FACP
Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine

Ellen Parker MD
Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine

Gregory Ozark MD, FACP, FAAP
Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine

Additional Information

Year Published: 2022 - AIMW